On 27 Feb 2014, at 16:23, Jan Vrany <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So after doing that, the actual implementation of the Parser can then be >> easily exchanged, the only thing it needs to do >> is to create a RB AST. > > OK, so the idea is remove RBParser but keep all RBProgramNode classes? >
If the Parser would be changed, then yes, that would be the idea. RBProgramNode
+ subclasses is an
AST. This AST can be created by any kind of Parser, it is independent.
Marcus
