On 06 Mar 2014, at 11:35, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 06 Mar 2014, at 11:17, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 06/03/2014 11:09, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On 06 Mar 2014, at 10:28, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Le 06/03/2014 10:08, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 06 Mar 2014, at 09:48, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 06/03/2014 09:32, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi guys.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My workflow is like this:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I load a configuration on CI with github:// magic in metacello conf.
>>>>>>> Then on local machine I add a local gitfiletree repo to the project 
>>>>>>> packages.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The thing is that the last version if loaded, but gitfiletree repo is 
>>>>>>> showing that second last is loaded. And yes, diffs with last one (not 
>>>>>>> loaded by gitfiletree opinion) show no changes and diffs with second 
>>>>>>> last (current one by gitfiletree opinion) show changes that were mede 
>>>>>>> in last version.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Say version .5 on CI, and gitfiletree is showing you only .1, .2, .3, 
>>>>>> and .4 , like that?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I also see the .5 version, but it’s bold i.e. “not loaded".
>>>> 
>>>> Are changes shown when you click on the .5 version in gitfiletree? on the 
>>>> .4 version in gitfiletree as well?
>>> 
>>> Version 5 does not have changes with working copy. While version 4 has. So 
>>> from my point of view it seams like version 5 is loaded but gitfiletree 
>>> thinks that only version 4 is loaded.
>> 
>> Understood. Is it a problem if I have a look at the image or at the git 
>> repository?
> 
> When I look in the monticello browser in the image.

And with applies to the both packages I have in that repo

> 
>> 
>> Thierry
>> -- 
>> Thierry Goubier
>> CEA list
>> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués
>> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
>> France
>> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95

Reply via email to