But you have GB's of RAM, right ;-) See EyeInspector>>#limit1 and limit2 that control how much to show in collections, maybe 100000 it too high ;-)
But in general, I think maybe we could use a dedicated EyeStringInspector. I agree that viewing a bigger string in the explorer/tree view is a bit silly, but it is correct though. Maybe #childrenFor[Object]: can be used to shortcut the depth of the tree. For strings characters could then no longer be shown. On 13 Mar 2014, at 20:49, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > I see that you haven't clicked on a 17K long string that opens a 17K items > long tree of characters with nice icons and makes your image bloat to 200+MB > in size. > > > --> 223 162 288 bytes for XXXX.image > > Look: (in 2.0 the explorer just shows a piece of text) > > <13-03-14 20-47-35.png> > > > . > > > <Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 20.28.45.png> > > <Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 20.29.10.png> > > But I hate the 'all inst vars' field, who uses that and for what ?? > > On 13 Mar 2014, at 20:16, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > >> I agree with that. >> >> I was inspecting a ZnResponse yesterday and it was very hard to see the >> contents etc. >> >> A general pain. I was clicking on the "inspect" option to see what the real >> content was. I was cursing a lot. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> >> wrote: >> I'm glad we're re-inventing the tools! And, I'm struggling with this tool in >> its current form... >> >> As others have mentioned, the "class" pseudo-variable is confusing, but here >> are some that I find worse: >> - The receiver does not change with the selection. For me, this was a key >> feature of the explorer. >> - It does not properly update e.g. if you are inspecting a class containing >> a dictionary and add an item to the dictionary, collapsing and expanding the >> dictionary node does not show the added item. It seems you must open an >> entirely new inspector. >> - If you toggle from EyeTreeInspector to EyeInspector, your code in the >> bottom pane is lost >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/EyeTreeInspector-not-ready-for-prime-time-tp4748966.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > >
