> well we will have to clean and simplify all that in the future. > This is why versionner should be good so that people use it and we can > simplify the declarations. > > Stef > > > But I had the feeling that Versionner UI is currently very limited vs > Metacello options (especially w.r.t. cross dialect support)
The problem is that metacello is too complex. :) And the API could be better. > Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to > MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any > other dialect/version ? For now this is ok to have multiple dialects in the metarepo because people may want to have gemstone and squeak version. Now for the core Pharo tool configruations should be as simple as possible (RB, …) Stef > >> >> >> Bye >> T. >> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr >> Von: "Nicolas Cellier" <[email protected]> >> An: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]> >> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry >> >> 2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: >> Nicolas, >> >> On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of the >> > Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that. >> >> I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able to >> save to MetaRepoForPharo30. >> >> >> Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials... >> I have now published with a symbolic stable version. >> >> Sven
