Hi Esteban, Yuri, It's really nice to hide extensions as objects and not anymore as protocols. I have been working with that for more than a year now, and it's very nice not to have to write anymore *Name-Of-Package to create extensions.
Thierry ________________________________________ De : Pharo-dev [pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] de la part de Esteban Lorenzano [esteba...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 7 avril 2014 13:21 À : Pharo Development List Objet : Re: [Pharo-dev] Package tags for extensions one of the things we need to continue improving is protocols… now they are objects (before they were just strings), but extensions are still name matching conventions, and they should be also objects (like ExtensionProtocol) or something like that. but well… future stuff. Esteban On 07 Apr 2014, at 05:54, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Now we have tags for packages in Pharo 3, and it’s very cool. So if I select > a tag ‘A’ in ‘MyPackage’ I will see all classes from category ‘MyPackage-A’. > On the other hand if I’m extending another class with a protocol > ‘*MyPackage-B’ I can’t see that class under the ‘B’ tag. Is this some kind of > issue or it’s still a work in progress. > > Cheers. > Uko
