Stéphane Ducasse writes: > On 11 Apr 2014, at 11:37, Nicolas Petton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> + Announcer >> >> + on:do:for: > > Nicolas did you check the api of Pharo? > Because I was wondering why in Pharo we do not have the for: argument
Yes, the difference is that we need it to be able to unregister later. Pharo doesn't have that issue. Nico > > >> + Node >> >> + navigationNodeAt:ifAbsent: >> + BlockClosure >> >> + tryCatch: >> + Environment >> >> + evaluate:for: >> + AmberCli >> >> + version: >> + Object >> >> + deprecatedAPI: >> - Environment >> >> - eval:on: >> - evaluateString:on: >> >> Cheers, >> Nico >> -- >> Nicolas Petton >> http://nicolas-petton.fr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr
