On 01 May 2014, at 00:52, Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > I see many usage of #should: in SciSmalltalk tests that could simply be > turned into #assert: or eventually #assert:equals: > Why wanting to use a block? > Other than #should:raise: and #shouldnt:raise:, I don't really see the point > of #should: alone anyway... > IMO should: should be deprecated, less is more. > I'm possibly the author of several of these #should: sends, so don't take it > personnally ;) > > P.S. or is it easier to restart the block in the Debugger? > I cross post to pharo-dev because it's a generic question, and there are a > few #should: sends in Pharo-3.0 too. I also do not understand why you would want to use a block. So unless there is a good reason to use that, a simpler API is preferable. BTW, and this was discussed before, #shouldnt:raise: is useless as well ;-)
