I dont see a big problem not having MetaRepoForPharo4 as public access , its not as if anyone will plant a pharo virus anytime soon and if a mistake is done, its not the end of the world , people can fix it if they find so annoying. Have there been any major issues so far with public access ?
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 28 May 2014, at 09:20, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> Am 28.05.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > >>> On 28 May 2014, at 03:17, Gabriel Cotelli <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> is the Meta Repo for Pharo 4 ready to use? > >>> > >>> I've configured my jobs in the contribution ci server to run also for > Pharo 4. But I can't copy the configuration to the meta repo for Pharo 4 to > make it available in the Configuration Browser. > >>> Maybe some permissions are missing? > >>> > >> > >> Yes, public write access was missing… I added that for now, but of > course the question is: do we really want it to be writable by everyone? > > > > No! And I would also want only configs to be put into the meta repo that > build green. So basically only the pharo contributions CI should upload > configs. But I can see that this might be too much effort and restriction. > > > > Norbert > > We just need a better infrastructure. Look at ATOM project. 1) > contributions are made with pull requests 2) they have a dedicated apm tool > for package submission/management. With monticello we’ve achieved the best > we can. And I guess we don’t have enough resources to build and maintain > new tools. > > Uko >
