On 29 May 2014, at 12:01, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 29 May 2014, at 11:57, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 29/5/14 09:45, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> On 29 May 2014, at 08:42, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> we should add Pharo 30 inbox because many changes for 40 have been >>>> published there. >>>> >>> Yes, for a while… or we just copy over all the slices. >>> >>> We need to start again to systematically do issue tracker: >>> >>> e.g. on an issue like that: put a note that the slice is in the wrong repo >>> and >>> a note: Next Action: copy slice to Pharo4 inbox. >> >> I do not think that copying slice is a good idea. >> And I would refrain to create bug entries because it takes so much time >> handling them. I added the inbox. But this is not enough… we would need to add the main repo, too, as for merging it needs the latest common ancestor (or maybe because we killed the 6MB of MC meta data…) Marcus
