Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 14 Jun 2014, at 12:18, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: Maybe IPv6 is something that can be added to the brainstorming list for Pharo 4 (or 5). Maybe this just needs some documentation of proven cases and CI jobs? While practical effects may be some unknown time off, IPv4 address exhaustion has already reached some parts of the world. * https://community.infoblox.com/blogs/2013/05/24/stages-ipv4-address-exhaustion * http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html I found this ot be an interesting discussion.... * http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/56115/is-ipv6-support-a-nice-to-have-feature-anymore cheers -ben |
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference between localhost... Ben Coman
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference between loca... Luc Fabresse
- [Pharo-dev] Zinc IPv6 (was Re: strange diff... Ben Coman
- Re: [Pharo-dev] Zinc IPv6 (was Re: stra... Luc Fabresse
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference between ... Sven Van Caekenberghe
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference betw... Luc Fabresse
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference ... Sven Van Caekenberghe
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference ... Ben Coman
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference betw... Ben Coman
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange difference ... Sven Van Caekenberghe
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange differ... Ben Coman
- Re: [Pharo-dev] strange differ... Sven Van Caekenberghe
