I believe this was already discussed long ago, with a decision not to go further that #cull: (or #value:) on Symbol, some even find that too much from a design perspective.
I like writing code like #(1 2 3) collect: #asString especially interactively, since it is less verbose. In what situation did you encounter a need to add #cull:cull: to Symbol ? On 19 Jun 2014, at 13:42, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > maybe we should implement #cull:cull: in symbol so that it will call #cull:? > Because this looks correct, if block has 1 parameter, then #cull:cull: boils > down to #value:, but when we have a symbol instead, we have an exception. > > I can open an issue and implement that stuff, but I want a feedback from the > conceptual point of view. > > Uko >
