Max,
Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm
no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation".
Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;)
Sven,
The bare minimum to load it is:
Gofer it
smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork';
package: 'Cloudfork-Common';
package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform';
load.
The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look...
>
> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of
> view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in
> the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ?
> >
> > Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256
> base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I
> probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for discussion.
> Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into
> System-Hashing.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Max
>
>
>
