On 04 Jul 2014, at 08:21, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Classes are global variables too. How it related here?
Yes, they are defined by the “Smalltalk globals” dictionary. To read a Global
the method has the binding
(the association from that global dictionary) in it’s literal frame and uses
the “push/pop LiteralVarible” bytecode
which pushes (or stores into) the value of the binding.
> And what about environments to support some kind of namespaces? Do you have
> plan for this?
>
We need them but I need to first finish other things...
Marcus
