I removed the question, but only after it was already marked to be closed by several people. Their argument was, that the question was "to broad". Once a discussion like this starts on Stackexchange sites there's always a herd behavior that's hard to stop.
Can you share the code you used for your search, Hernán? Hernán Morales Durand wrote > The contest is gone? > > Anyway, the closest useful method I have found by iterating all ASTs in > standard 3.0 image : > > - Declares arguments > - Has assignment > - Has sequence > - Has blocks with 0 and 2 arguments > - Declares temporaries > - Has binary messages > - Has unary messages > - Has keyword messages > - Has super messages > - Has cascade > - Has return > - Uses String and Integer -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-Syntax-in-a-Postcard-contest-tp4766793p4767121.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
