On 16/7/14 19:02, Udo Schneider wrote:
All,
I'm currently making some changes to the LDAP package to make it play
nicer with ActiveDirectory and SSL. Up to now all those changes were
non-intrusive to the current packages. But I'm hitting a few issues
now which would change the base packages.
What's the policy on this?
Improving :)
We need stronger and better libraries.
Keeping those changes in my own fork or submitting them to a
maintainer (who?).
I gave you access to the PharoExtras repo.
Just add tests and build the best LDAP you want :)
Make sure that everything work well and suits your needs.
I'm not sure that current design is good. At least when olivier auverlot
showed to me I was skeptical about the chapter we/he wrote
on it.
In addition ... as far as I can see the current package is Pharo only
(was Squeak).
If "Pharo-only" is o.k. I could for instance integrate my stuff for
LDAP-over-SSL in there directly (based on Zodiac).
Excellent idea.
Our goal is to make sure that people can make business.
Thanks,
Udo
