there Shampoo already http://dmitrymatveev.co.uk/shampoo/
or do you mean something different ? On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 26/07/2014 10:04, Marcus Denker a écrit : > > On 26 Jul 2014, at 10:02, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >> >> Thierry we asked Mark Rizun to look into get a full "compilation unit" >>> as an AST: >>> - AST for packages >>> - AST for class definition. >>> He should look at what gisela proposed and any feedback is interesting. >>> >>> Only the name AST is wrong: the S stand for Syntax. There is no syntax >> for Classes, nor >> packages. >> > We could have one. It would allow people to write Pharo code with emacs, > have a pharo emacs-el mode, and try a different way to use git :) > > >> What we want is models for everything with *the same API* as the nodes of >> the AST. >> (and visitors that can visit the whole structure) >> > This would be cool. I have the nodes and the visitors for all the way from > packages to method, but it stops at the method / class description level > (and switches to the RB ast then). > > Thierry > >
