2014-08-25 18:40 GMT+02:00 Juraj Kubelka <[email protected]>:

> Hi!
>
> I have created the Nautilus roadmap
> <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-workingRoadmaps> (in the pull
> request <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-workingRoadmaps/pull/3>).
> I have taken as a base the recent email of Nicolai Hess.
>
> If anyone wants to stress something important or give a link to a bug we
> should consider, I appreciate it. You can write it here in the mainline
> list or by changing the roadmap.
>
> Thanks,
> Juraj
>


Great!
Thank you.


>
> On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:01 AM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 23/8/14 23:34, Juraj Kubelka wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have found useful those roadmaps:
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-workingRoadmaps
> Could it be possible to make one for the Pharo tools (e.g. Nautilus)? I
> think there are people who have better idea what to make first and what
> later. I would like to contribute on it and roadmap could help me.
>
>
> Sure!
> The point of the roadmap is really listing the feasible steps to improve
> the system in a regular manner.
> Create one for Nautilus.
> - I would remove the bytecode and text icons (which are not consistent
> with the instance access BTW)
> - I would remove the history navigation
> for example
>
> Now we will certainly add (but in a modular way) the GT-Inspector. But it
> does not mean that we should not continue to improve the traditional tools.
>
> Stef
>
>
> Thanks,
> Juraj
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to