Anything that starts to rationalise keystrokes is definitely appreciated. Particularly with thought to similar operations using the same keystrokes in different browsers.
While it's taken some effort to get used to the newer multi-key shortcuts, the fact that it allows more more-reasonably grouped keys is a win. I really want more keystrokes for refactorings and other code operations - that multi-keys makes room for. So please keep pushing on this. Tim Sent from my iPhone > On 29 Aug 2014, at 07:30 pm, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Cmd+o cannot be mapped on Cmd+s because when you are in the code editor of > the inspector, you want to both be able to accept the code and open the > result of a selection. > > In the moose image we remove the global bindings altogether, so I would be > certainly fine with rebinding them. That is until we find a better solution :) > > Cheers, > Doru > > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> We are on our way to integrate (finally) GTools into Pharo. >> For now it will be the Playground and the Inspector, since the Debugger is >> still not ready. >> >> Now, I’m facing a problem. The new command for playground (cmd+o) conflicts >> with some menyu commands: (cmd+o+[w|t|etc]). Since we cannot handle both, we >> need to choose one. >> I do not have a clear idea, so I want your opinions. >> So far, I think this: >> >> 1) cmd+o in playground is not so clear, maybe we could map thet to an >> “accept” (cmd+s) or an “execure” (cmd+e)… >> 2) we could map cmd+o+etc. to something else. But I do not know to what. >> >> So, I hear opinions :) >> >> Esteban > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"
