Yes, I’m wandering if I can reimplement #uses: in some other way… Uko
On 02 Sep 2014, at 16:44, Camille Teruel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2 sept. 2014, at 16:21, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, does anybody know what #literals in RBSmalllintContext stand for? >> Because it’s calculated in a very weird way with the use of literalSemaphore >> and literalProcess variables. > > No, it's weird indeed. Apparently it stores all symbols and bindings founds > in the literal arrays of all methods in the system... > A kind of cache maybe, but only used by two methods #uses: and #isAbstract > (no senders for the latter BTW) > >> Uko > >
