On 22 Sep 2014, at 15:00, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marcus Denker-4 wrote
>> But for me it is important that they are “closed*
>
> I understand. It seems Closed + special status serves both needs. I had
> proposed "stale" before, but it seemed that existing "postponed" was close
> enough last time we discussed.
>
I will add a "Closed (stale)” status (sometimes when I find time later the week)
Marcus
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
