On 26 Sep 2014, at 16:10, Camille Teruel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Another annoying thing is that when you copy a hierarchy you have to change 
> the subclass relationships manually.
> For example, if you select two classes -- Superclass Subclass -- and copy 
> them you end up with NewSubclass as a subclass of Superclass instead of 
> NewSuperclass.
> When copying a big hierarchy it's tiresome.
> 

We need to distinguish between #copy: low level copy of classes, as opposed to 
the tool, which should provide a nice dialog (copy comment yes, no, copy 
superclass hierarchy, where to put
the copy…)

        Marcus


> On 26 sept. 2014, at 14:08, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Copy class needs more information to do a good job
>> 
>> At the moment, the copy class command only asks for the name of the new 
>> class. That is not enough information. There have been a number of issues 
>> posted about copying (or not) of the class comment, Issue 13247, 10039, 
>> 12294 and 12265. 
>> 
>> Other information that can be helpful is the package where the new class 
>> should be. I nearly never need a copy in the package where the original was.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Stephan
>> 
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14084
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to