If my 2 cents make sense, it will be nice to have things similar to text 
editors. E.g. triple click for line select.

Uko

> On 01 Oct 2014, at 07:51, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> My perception is that this kind of small changes adds no value.
>> It just removes a small bit of value.
>> So it's going to frustrate someone for nothing.
>> Not a big frustration, I concede, but a gratuitous one.
>> 
>> I think its the opposite. People will simply adapt.
> 
> Seriously I find that attitude really sad. 
> So why don't add TxText with average syntax higthlitghting and that igor just 
> does something else
> on the sake that people will adapt.
> 
> For me there is no justification for not having the same behavior with is 
> working perfectly well.
> It is not a question of dogma but just pragmatic 
>     - it works well
>     - it is handy
>     - it is not incompatible with the double click dogma.
>  
>> 
>> Finally, the best thing it brings is exposing that some events are handled 
>> incorrectly.
>> At least I hope it will give us a chance to correct them :)
>> 
>> :)
>> 
>> Doru
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 2014-09-30 22:59 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I can see how people get use with this behavior, but I am quite certain that 
>> the solution from PluggableTextMorph was a workaround solution due to a 
>> missing double click event. Now we have that event and we can use it where 
>> it is appropriate.
>> 
>> It's not that we copy things for the sake of copying, but I simply think 
>> double clicking is a better choice here. click-pause-click introduces, from 
>> a cognitive perspective, a hidden modal mode. That is, you have no chance of 
>> knowing in which state you are. I was several times annoyed by inadvertently 
>> selecting pieces of code (often during demos). At the same time, I believe 
>> it is reasonable to assume that programmers know how to double click.
>> 
>> So, yes, I did think of it quite explicitly :)
>> 
>> Doub
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Nicolas Cellier 
>> <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> I find click pause click useful.
>> No stress nor necessary adjustment of double-click delay.
>> What could be the intention of a user clicking repeatedly on the same area?
>> Did you think of it?
>> If copying what everyone else does is the sole value, then let's not do 
>> Pharo.
>> 
>> 2014-09-30 21:34 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I explained before but it went unnoticed. The selection happens on double 
>> click like in any other editor.
>> 
>> The regular PluggableTextMorph also tries to do it on a kind of a double 
>> click, only it is implemented as click-pause-click. So, if you click once, 
>> wait 5 minutes, and click again, it will select. This is not particularly 
>> useful.
>> 
>> So, Rubric selects on double click.
>> 
>> Now, as I mentioned before, there happens to be a random double click issue. 
>> I cannot reproduce it, but sometimes it happens. Also, when I save the image 
>> and load it back, the problem is gone. Please note that this issue is not 
>> related to Rubric, but to the double click event throughout the entire 
>> image. For example, if you see that double click does not work in Rubric, 
>> try to double click on the window title to maximize a window and you will 
>> see that it does not work.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:42 PM, stepharo <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> With the previous tools I can select a piece of text by clicking after its 
>> last element and now I cannot
>> or I can but sometimes.
>> 
>> So what is the fix?
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
>> 
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
>> 
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
>> 
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
> 

Reply via email to