I love these little things. This is a great example of how value should not be confused with cost. Small can be quite big after all :)
Doru On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > Very nice !! > > On 14 Oct 2014, at 16:42, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> On 10 Oct 2014, at 12:29, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 10:57, Jan Kurš <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Thank you for the replies. I see it is not an easy bug to fix. Do you > have any idea, when this can be fixed? > >>> > >> I will try to fix it next week... > >> > >>> Or can you suggest me some other way/workaround, how to get/generate > the source code of a block? > >>> > >> > >> The old compiler used a hack to decompile blocks for getting a textual > representation… one could port > >> the code from Pharo2 to the Package OpalDecompiler in Pharo4. (but I > actually like the current scheme of > >> using the byte code-offset-to-AST mapping more). > >> > > > > step one: A nice tool… GTInspector view of the byte codes that > highlights what is thinks is the corresponding code in the source. > > (This living Bytecode view replaces what before just printed out the > #longPrintString of the CompiledMethod): > > > > > > > > <Playground.jpeg> > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
