Eliot Miranda-2 wrote > I responded... I have to disagree with your recommendation. You say that you intend #= to mean "has the same effect as" rather than "is the same as".
One of the best things about Smalltalk is how easily we can say what we mean. I think you would be better off creating a method named something like #hasSameEffectAs: to answer what you are presently using #= to do, and change #= to answer the, in my opinion, more sensible "is the same as" that we conventionally think of #= meaning. $0.02 worth and worth everything you paid for it. :-) Richard -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/CompiledMethod-hash-can-produce-clashes-tp4784722p4784771.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
