I disagree and I downvoted the question because its clear he did not even bother to google for documentation. Maybe he forgot or maybe he meants something else than it is already available. I am mostly against SO strict policy but in this case I will have to agree with it, the question is too vague for it anyway.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > 2014-10-17 23:43 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]>: > >> Nicolai Hess wrote >> > It is a valid question >> >> I agree. And at the same time, after reading their reasoning, while >> seemingly overzealous, their decision seems logically sound based on SO >> rules. I added this comment: >> >> I think that the closest you have is >> ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoProjectCatalog/…, which is an >> attempt-in-progress in making a package catalog. Also, most better-known >> Pharo projects seem to be hosted on SmalltalkHub which provides a Markdown >> description for each project (provided of course that someone has filled >> it >> out!) >> > > thank you! > > > >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Question-on-Package-comments-SO-tp4785191p4785223.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> >
