On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi Mariano, > > 2014-10-22 9:53 GMT-03:00 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>: > > Hi Esteban, > > > > You may want to check some proxy implementations I did. You can check > Ghost > > proxies in my PhD thesis: > > http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/archives/phd/PhD-2012-Martinez-Peck.pdf and > > here: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00877757/PDF/main.pdf > > > I'll take a look into them, thank you. > > > > One of the things I did was to be able to enable (could even be done > > dynamically) debugging capabilities to proxies..that is...proxies would > > understand theirself all necessary methods for > > inspecting/debugging/printing/exploring them without actually > intercepting > > the message. You can read about that in the above links. As a quick > > prototype.... you way want to create a subclass of ProtoObject or > directly > > add those messages to the Glorp proxy. > > That's exactly what I did, and you can see added methods to > AbstractProxy (Glorp) in the latest commits of Glorp at SmalltalkHub. > > However, my mail had two intentions, one is a rant about why some > tools depend on methods defined only in Object but not in ProtoObject > (and hence, most Proxies). > The other intention was to learn about the newcoming Proxies > implementation, about which you helpfully provided two documents to > read about. > > > Also...AFAIK, Camille Teruel was doing some stuff with Ghost Proxies, so > he > > might have the latest version available somewhere. In anycase, my > original > > code was in: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Ghost but saw there is also: > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~CAR/Ghost/ which may be newer. > > So this is the implementation of the previously described thesis? > > Yes. > Thank you! > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
