> On 29.10.2014, at 10:00, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 29 Oct 2014, at 09:54, Max Leske <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >>> On 29.10.2014, at 09:45, Marcus Denker <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> @free.fr <http://free.fr/>> >>>>> We need the concept of “this is code that is automatically generated, it >>>>> is not part of any package and this is meant to be like that”. >>>> >>>> Nautilus (or RPackage?) does provide the ‘Unpackaged’ category. Wouldn’t >>>> that be “good enough” for now? >>>> >>> People would emmediatly report bugs that there is unpackaged code. >> >> True. >> >>> We need to concept of “this is ok that there is no package”. >> >> But we don’t have that right now. And the problem with nil as category >> remains. How about replacing a nil category with ‘Unpackaged’ implicitly for >> the time being? It would at least “fix” one problem. >> > > Ok. > > Marcus >
Issue with slice: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14371/Traits-should-not-be-allowed-to-have-nil-as-their-category <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14371/Traits-should-not-be-allowed-to-have-nil-as-their-category> Cheers, Max
