> On 23 Nov 2014, at 23:49, Jan Vrany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> It would be very nice small experiment to plug in the Petitparser based
>> one.
>>
>> Especially interesting: Would it be much slower?
> Hi Markus,
>
> Jan Kurs and me are now working on some PetitParser stuff. If we succeed
> then PetitParser-based parser would be as fast as current hand-written
> RBParser. We're at the beginning but preliminary benchmarks are very
> promising.
>
Very nice… the idea of having this parser as the default one would be very
interesting…
e.g. one could re-use and extend it very easily, and PetitParser itself as a
core feature
(so people can create tiny parsers easily)...
> Error recovery and incremental reparsing are in the queue (if we
> find a time :-)
That would be great.
To replace the hand written one we would need at least good error messages, but
error revocovery
would be even better. I would be very interested in that.
Marcus
