Ahh yeah. You’re right, I read it too quick and in the wrong context and thought was talking about Purism in programming languages giving only functional as example.
Never mind about that page… And yet we could start one where we could talk about it. Here is an idea: LISP: "Everything is an Expression” Haskell and Miranda: "Everything is a Function” Self and Smalltalk: "Everything is an Object" could easily do a wikipedia page on “Paradigmatic Programming Languages” or something like that I’m not an academic but sounds like their beach and sounds to me it could be quite a reference > On Nov 28, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 28 Nov 2014, at 16:55, Sebastian Sastre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Just a heads up… >> >> This is asking for a fix: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language) >> >> LISP and Self and Smalltalk people should add their voice there >> >> Unleash your nerd :) > > I don't understand, what do you mean ? > > The page describes some language called Pure that seems to be legit, so what > is wrong with that (apart from the name being ambitious, pretentious) ? > > And there is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo which is OK but needs some > love. > >
