yes I know
I will try to put a student on it but I must get a good one ;-)

#Luc

2014-12-02 14:53 GMT+01:00 Santiago Bragagnolo <[email protected]
>:

> wow. is amazing.
>
> 2014-12-02 14:46 GMT+01:00 Luc Fabresse <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> all shells are not named *sh
>> for example, I really would love to have Xiki (
>> http://xiki.org/screencasts/) in Pharo ;-)
>>
>> #Luc
>>
>> 2014-12-02 14:17 GMT+01:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Am 02.12.2014 um 13:31 schrieb Ben Coman <[email protected]>:
>>>> >
>>>> > [email protected] wrote:
>>>> >> I've put Guille's Scale thing (
>>>> http://guillep.github.io/blog/2014/01/23/replacing-bash-with-pharo/)
>>>> into Pharo 3.0
>>>> >> Details on how to use here:
>>>> >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Scale
>>>> >> Enjoy,
>>>> >> Phil
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > We named the command we needed scale, because scales are in shells,
>>>> > > it sounded nice.
>>>> >
>>>> > Nice lateral thinking, but it seems like a stretch :)
>>>> >
>>>> > For making a shell, why not something simple in the tradition of sh,
>>>> bash, csh, ksh, psh? e.g. pharosh or phsh?
>>>> >
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Scale is what it was. There is also Coral, so, well, marine names are
>>> staying.
>>>
>>> If we want a 'sh', what about:
>>>
>>> phish
>>> phash
>>> phosh
>>>
>>> psh is not too bad after all.
>>> pharosh looks cool too.
>>>
>>> With "phish" we can say, "I am phishing" in the same vein as "I am
>>> bashing".
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to