"I’m not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt..."
is ? really ? wow I am impressed I thought reimplementing git in smalltalk would be a huge effort. Pharo surprises me once more :) so the problem now is to build the tools on top of it to utilize git ? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 04.12.2014, at 09:47, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > What are the benefits that justify the effort to reimplementing git in > smalltalk ? > > > > I’m not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is > FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt... > > >
