2014-12-26 23:07 GMT+01:00 Clément Bera <[email protected]>: > > > 2014-12-26 22:30 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier < > [email protected]>: > >> >> >> 2014-12-26 19:02 GMT+01:00 Clément Bera <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> It does not happen with the Cog VM nor with older Pharo VM. >>> >>> It's a VM bug and it's specific to the Pharo-VM fork. >>> >>> Most probably it's because of the float refactoring for Smallfloat some >>> stuff got incorrectly merged. >>> >>> Please consider writing a test for that in FloatTest and make a slice >>> for Pharo if you have some time. >>> >> >> Thanks Clement, >> >> there's already a test that is failing (FloatTest>>testNaNCompare). >> >> What I find amazing is that I did not find this failure on the CI >> server... >> > > That's because the CI server does not use the latest VM, but the stable > one... >
Ah OK, the CI server is single bleeding-edge rather than double (VM+image) which might be a reasonnable choice for separating concerns. But that was misleading! If downloading the artefact from the CI server serves you a different version than tested... >> >> >>> >>> 2014-12-26 18:35 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]> >>>> Date: 2014-12-26 16:52 GMT+01:00 >>>> Subject: regression of NaN comparison >>>> To: Pharo Development <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> I downloaded latest Pharo4.0-mac.zip from https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/ >>>> and I experienced a resurgence of this old bug: >>>> >>>> 2<Float nan. >>>> >>>> This is not one of the errors reported in the CI server. >>>> Any clue? >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
