> On 30 Dec 2014, at 12:39, Hilaire <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 29/12/2014 13:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit : >> Hilaire, >> >>> On 29 Dec 2014, at 12:21, Hilaire <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 28/12/2014 21:04, [email protected] a écrit : >>>> >>>> Jokes aside, Pharo is solid for commercial work. >>>> >>> >>> It is crazy how it seems so successful in this particular area. >> >> I have a hard time interpreting this remark as positive. > > I think one should be careful when writing email as my enthusiastic tone > was not transported through the wire. > > It is only mean to be a p-o-s-i-t-i-v-e remark, one can rephrase it as: > "It is wonderful to see Pharo successful in the business area because in > the long term it can definitely help to sustain the Pharo evolution, > maturation and development effort, thanks to the support that such > successful business can/could contribute to Pharo, though visibility, > financial support or/and source code contribution to Pharo core or > external Pharo library package."
Ah, cool. Sorry about the misinterpretation. > Hilaire > >> >> Why do you say that is 'crazy' ? >> >> Why do you say 'seems' ? >> >> Why do you say 'this particular area' ? >> >> Sven >> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Geo - http://drgeo.eu > iStoa - http://istoa.drgeo.eu
