Markus wrote:
>Everything I ever did for Pharo I wanted to do for Squeak… but I could not 
>because
>someone was violently against it.

Pharo now looks more and more what I dreamed about already back in the Squeak 
days. 
The toyish look is gone, the system gets cleaner and cleaner. Lots of tests, 
nice libs,
CI infrastructure, easy image handling/downloading with launcher

Still we are not there...
 
Eliot wrote:
>We will heal.  It may take a long time, but we will.  

I wonder how we can all come together again. It would help both sides to grow.
Squeak facilities could sit on top of Pharo. Maybe with a cleaner morphic like 
Bloc.
Phratch shows that this is possible.

Things I currently miss in Pharo that were cool to use and demo in Squeak:
 - Support for more media and devices (video, mp3, sound recording/replaying, 
cam, joystick, ...)
 - Collaboration tools:
      - Shared worlds/remote views similar to Nebraska (to collaborate on code 
or remote interact with an image) and Telemorphic
      - Text and Audio Chat application, possibly video chat
 - Sending morphs over the network (using the Badge morph)
 - Shared world (Morphic) projects/Image segments
 - Bookmorphs (putting some text and graphic, saving as *.book, loading later 
again or sending to others)

Also it would be supercool if Pharo images would run on Berts SqueakJS...

Bye
T.

Reply via email to