Yes, I agree. This is on our todo.

Cheers,
Alexandre


> On Jan 19, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> I strongly believe that the concrete implementation that links Roassal to the 
> data format should be moved to a separate package and ideally, to another 
> configuration.
> 
> The generic engine should be decoupled from concrete data sources.
> 
> Cheers,
> Doru
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com> 
> wrote:
> It should yes
> 
> Roassal2 now depends on NeoJSON by the way.
> 
> Alexandre
> 
> 
> > On Jan 19, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Is this in the latest moose 5.1 build ?
> 
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> www.tudorgirba.com
> 
> "Every thing has its own flow"
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> moose-...@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




Reply via email to