On Feb 6, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Guillermo Polito <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, but imagine how complex that bootstrap becomes when you want to add to 
> your classes:
> 
> - traits
> - layouts
> - slots
> ...
> 
> And expressing all that in C also :)

Surely the bootstrap doesn't have to be expressed in C?!?!  It can be expressed 
in Smalltalk and still be a bootstrap right?

> 
> El Fri Feb 06 2015 at 10:47:19 AM, Markus Fritsche <[email protected]> 
> escribió:
>> 
>> On 06.02.2015 09:33, stepharo wrote:
>>> In the coming months we will work on putting in place our bootstrapping 
>>> kernel.
>>> There are no Smalltalk able to do that right now.
>> 
>> GNU Smalltalk does just that, if it doesn't find an image, it will be 
>> bootstrapped by using the shipped .st fileouts. 
>> 
>> A bit of cheating is involved, a compiler & initialization is implemented on 
>> the VM side. 
>> 
>> So I would say "there are no Smalltalk that are able to do that right now 
>> the way we want to do it" :-P
>> 
>> (Pissing at the door contest, to refer to another unquoted metaphor :-D)

Reply via email to