2015-02-06 22:00 GMT+01:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>: > Really interesting discussion. I like pragmas but this is interesting to > see them challenged. >
Thanks. It's a pleasure to discuss that way :) > Yes, but there end up being lots of naming conventions and they are >> non-obvious. Whereas pragmas, because they are in-your-face in the methods >> in question, don't need conventions. They just need documenting ;-). >> > Thierry I'm skeptical that multiple protocol will save the problem because > you will rely on coding conventions. > Pragma as well: just explain the conventions behind the gtInspector pragmas, for example. But give me multiple protocols and I'll show you the same conventions rewritten in less lines (and a slightly more efficient code). > And pragma is a clever tagging. > Then maybe we should remove protocols and replace them with pragmas :) Thierry > > Stef > > >
