thank chris.
I can tell you that I would be even more productive if I would be a
native speaker....
So should we use rowCount for method argument?
because we got rows: rows meaning rows: rowCount and I rewrote them as
rows: rowNumber but it could be better to have
rows: rowCount.
tx
Stef
Le 9/2/15 22:11, Chris Muller a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:05 PM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
a matrix has rowCount and columnCount and I was wondering if this api is the
way to get
the number of columns and rows of a matrix.
Would rowNumber and columnNumber be better?
I think rowCount is better than rowNumber for that.
You used "number of rows" in your own English right there, so
"numberOfRows" would be just as descriptive as rowCount, but not
better and certainly not worth changing the API, IMO.
