Great. Thanks Doru. 100 minute turn around. wow! :) Its 2AM here so I'll try it out tomorrow.
Now sorry I forgot to mention that both these forms * Collection>>#do: * Collection>>do: would be useful since individuals vary their use in documentation. Actually I mostly use the latter, but the case that sparked the post used the former. cheers -ben On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote: > Excellent! > > Thank you Tudor. > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > 2015-02-10 14:00 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > Indeed. Nice idea. Available in the latest GT-SpotterExtensions-Core: > > Name: GT-SpotterExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.57 > > Author: TudorGirba > > Time: 10 February 2015, 5:59:41.775209 pm > > UUID: 7de47651-7d17-44cd-ac70-467955fa903c > > Ancestors: GT-SpotterExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.56 > > > > added spotter for concrete method reference like: > > Collection>>#do: (thanks Ben for the suggestion) > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> When I am reading Fogbugz issues, often there are method references > using > >> the common convention "MCDefinitionIndex>>#add: for a fully defined > >> reference. > >> > >> It would be nice to be able to copy/paste that fully defined reference > >> into Spotter and get delivered straight to that method. You might still > >> list other implementors of the method, but the fully defined reference > would > >> be at the top, or somehow highlighted. > >> > >> I might get around to trying to code this myself, but I mention it in > case > >> it catches the interest of Spotter core team. > >> > >> cheers -ben > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "Every thing has its own flow" > >
