I like it, it is just one method.
> On 16 Feb 2015, at 22:41, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Guillermo Polito wrote
>> Sean, but if you need something like that, why wouldn't you load
>> aconcagua?
>>
>> I'm just in the crusade of putting less in the kernel by default ^^.
>
> Good question! The little project I was working on when I implemented that
> method /was/ using Aconcagua! But:
> 1. This is a simple, common conversion which
> a. could make the kernel itself a bit more intention revealing
> Job>>#progress
> ^ min >= max ifTrue: [ 1 ] ifFalse: [ (currentValue - min) / (max -
> min) ]
> could become:
> ^ min >= max ifTrue: [ 100 percent ] ifFalse: [ (currentValue - min) /
> (max
> - min) ]
> b. would've made my life a bit easier on several occasions, but feels much
> too lightweight to load a library for. There doesn't seem to be an entire
> domain behind it. One method gets you the whole thing.
> 2. AFAICT, Aconcagua doesn't really solve this problem. It defines families
> of units and conversions between them, but here there's just one concept as
> mentioned in 1.b. above
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Number-percent-tp4805988p4806047.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
