> On 24 Feb 2015, at 07:49, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Just my 2 cents:
>
> I find this really useful and have already implemented this extension in a
> couple of my packages, as writing:
>
> RuleChecker check: (RPackageOrganizer default packageNamed: ‘Kernel’)
>
> is much worse than:
>
> RuleChecker check: ‘Kernel’ asPackage
>
>
Sometimes I wonder if Packages should not be part of the Smalltalk globals
namespace…
e.g. packages could have a nice reflective API:
MyPackage unload.
and even an API for using… e.g. a Compiler has a very tiny surface API:
OpalCompiler compile: ‘….’
(but I do not really like nested classes, which is what people will now
suggest…)
Marcus
