2015-03-04 10:16 GMT+01:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > > Le 4 mars 2015 09:51, "Thierry Goubier" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > > > > > > > 2015-03-04 9:22 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Here is a little rant about DVCS that I came across: > >> > >> Unorthodocs: Abandon your DVCS and Return to Sanity > >> > >> > http://bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity/ > >> > >> What struck my attention was that this guys (1) knows what he is > talking about and (2) recognises both Smalltalk and Monticello explicitly > as ancestors ! > > > > > > Interestingly, one of the things he is discussing is the versionning of > external data (blobs). > > > >> > >> > >> This also shows that not all is fun and jolly in git(hub) land. > > > > > > Of course. We do with what we have (and what is popular) :) > > Still, the full local github history, the ability to push to several repos > and the surrounding ecosystem makes it very fine. No one is forced to > branch on every single feature... I have been coming back from that for > example. > I agree. What I'd add to the git benefits is a fairly good merge algorithm as well.
> master and develop with a couple tags do the trick. > One of the good things is the flexibility it offers. Thierry > > Phil > > > > > Thierry >
