Re: [Pharo-dev] Ring class/metaclass

Sun, 08 Mar 2015 23:52:02 -0700 

> On 08 Mar 2015, at 20:16, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
>    RGClassDefinition named: className.
> 
>    does not create the associated metaclass. It means that all the clients 
> will have to create the metaclass explicitly
>    and I wonder if it would not be better that the default RingClass 
> definition creates it.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
Yes. In general the API needs to be updated to follow the one for classes… 

        Marcus

Reply via email to