Hi Stef,
Please see http://voss.logicarts.com/licensing I'm not a lawyer, so I can't
say anything about the interpretation of GPLv3,
except to comment without prejudice: As it is a complex subject, my intention
was that users may prefer to negotiate a
commercial licence with technical support, which may well be cheaper than the
alternative legal services. I'm open to
suggestions and negotiation, but I do need to monetise my time and effort -
nobody paid me to write VOSS.
Regards,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: stepharo [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 8:57 AM
To: Any question about pharo is welcome; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Porting Voss to Pharo
I think that the author of voss should reply.
Stef
Le 6/3/15 23:07, Stephan Eggermont a crit :
On 06/03/15 16:16, stepharo wrote:
Hi guys
if some of you are interested to drive porting VOSS to Pharo, let me
know John sent me the code and I can give it to you.
There is a dual license
- LGPL
- commercial
What does LGPL mean for VOSS? At FOSDEM I talked with Bradley Kuhn of
the FSF. It is something that has been on their to do list for a while
now. In the 'strict' interpretation it is as viral as GPL for
smalltalk code.
Stephan
______________________________________________
This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
