This is solved with the integration of issue 14353 into build 40548.
On an OSX > Virtualbox > LinuxMint17 with the following script...
for i in `seq 1 10` ;
do
(time $MYPHAROVM $MYIMAGE \
eval "(Delay forSeconds: 1) wait") 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep real
done
Build 40547 gives...
real 0m1.288s
real 0m1.256s
real 0m1.258s
real 0m0.254s
real 0m0.269s
real 0m0.274s
real 0m0.260s
real 0m0.245s
real 0m0.254s
real 0m1.260s
Build 40548 gives...
real 0m1.285s
real 0m1.259s
real 0m1.260s
real 0m1.260s
real 0m1.280s
real 0m1.267s
real 0m1.265s
real 0m1.293s
real 0m1.267s
real 0m1.278s
HTH,
cheers -ben
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is not going to get as much use before Release as I had hoped, so I
> refactored it to be able to easily switch between the existing and new code
> by making two schedulers...
> * DelayMillisecondScheduler - essentially the existing code
> * DelayMicrosecondScheduler - based off new primitive
> which are switchable on the fly via a System Setting.
>
> To try to make it easier to review, I've separated changes into three
> stages:
> * SLICE.10 accumulates changes the Delay class to add some better
> semantics to instance variables and method renames
> * SLICE.14 accumulates changes to split DelayScheduler into two subclasses
> for the two different schedulers (use the incoming code in the merge
> conflict)
> * SLICE.17 accumulates changes to modify DelayMicrosecondScheduler, plus a
> couple of polishing things.
>
> I've added some review notes to the issue
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14353
>
> fyi, Tomorrow I start a new job at Buewaters Power Station [1] (2 x 208MW
> generators). They've been without an electrical engineer for three months
> leading up to their annual outage in five weeks, so I'm probably flat there
> playing catch-up for the next two months. Today (GMT+8) would be a really
> good time to engage me with feedback and queries. I'll try to hang out on
> IRC as much as possible to speed up discussion.
>
> [1] http://www.bluewatersps.com.au/
>
> cheers -ben
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:09 AM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Please help us to push ben code.
>
>
>
> -------- Message transféré --------
> Sujet : Re: [Pharo-dev] Super fast delay
> Date : Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:00:25 +0800
> De : Ben Coman <[email protected]>
> Répondre à : Pharo Development List <[email protected]>
> Pour : Pharo Development List <[email protected]>
>
>
> I've updated this fix for build 40504. The following slice is read for
> review.
>
> SLICE-Issue-14353-Delay-refactoring-part-2---change-from-milliseconds-to-microseconds-BenComan.6
>
> Even if you do not feel up to reviewing the code, it would be good for a
> few people to merge this to get a broad sample of symptoms fixed or caused.
>
> 1. Open up Monticello and get ready to load the above slice from
> Pharo4Inbox repository.
> 2. In a workspace, do "Delay stopTimerEventLoop". Ignore the
> #intercyclePause: message that stream by.
> 3. Merge slice.
> 4. In a workspace, do "Delay startTimerEventLoop". The stream of
> #interCyclePause message should fade.
> 5. Operate as you normally would. Test some cases that previously caused
> an error.
>
> cheers -ben
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:32:48PM -0400, stepharo wrote:
>
> Good Morning Ben, Stef,
>
> > We really need people to have a look at the code of Ben.
>
> I downloaded a Pharo-4 image today and executed:
>
> To clarify. The fix is not yet in Pharo-4.
>
>
> time pharo --nodisplay --headless ./Pharo-40490.image eval "(Delay
> forSeconds: 5) wait"
> a Delay(5000 msecs)
>
> real 0m1.254s
> user 0m1.192s
> sys 0m0.060s
>
>
> So the first delay doesn't appear to wait the five seconds. I
> would like to work on kqueue/epoll and remove polling and it
> looks this involves code with Delay as well. I wonder if you
> could provide an overview of what needs to be done and what is
> done?
>
> The pre-requisite issue 14942 is waiting for review. It really should take
> only 10 minutes to review...
> 1. In latest Pharo 4, inspect "Delay newCodeEnabled" and observe that it
> is "true".
> 2. Open the Pharo4Inbox and filter on 14942.
> 3. Select newest slice and <Merge>.
> 4. Observe the diff shows all "false" parts removed (it doesn't really get
> much simpler than this to review).
> 5. Click <merge> to finish.
> 6. Observe the image continues to run smoothly.
> 7. Report your observations on https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14942
>
>
> btw, after the cleanup done by Issue 14942, Issue 14966 can delete ten
> class variables from Delay.
> When 14942 is integrated, can 14966 be integrated very soon after that. I
> am basing the change of Delay to microsecond delay off 14966.
> cheers -ben
>
>
>
>
> I need to refresh myself on the fix I did back in 2-Dec. Its languished
> while some support infrastructure was added to help the system ride-through
> the change.
>
> cheers -ben
>
>
>
>
>
