> On 17 Mar 2015, at 16:22, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 17 Mar 2015, at 16:19, Thierry Goubier <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-03-17 16:07 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>
>> > On 17 Mar 2015, at 15:59, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > All class comments seem to have been modified ?
>> > Was that intentional ?
>> >
>>
>> I think that is an overside of the GIT commit: it commits the comment it
>> gets, and this is the template when there is none.
>>
>> This also means that those classes appear as having been commented, even if
>> they weren’t.
>
> not really… they are still marked as “uncommented” in the image.
> I really don’t know why the export showed as commented, thought… I suppose a
> bug in the exporter.
bad implementation (no, interesting design decision):
comment
"Answer the receiver's comment. (If missing, supply a template) "
| aString |
aString := self instanceSide organization classComment.
aString isEmpty ifFalse: [^ aString].
^self classCommentBlank
I would return nil there and let the tools handle the template.
(ah, and that the comment is stored on the organisation is of course strange
too…)
Marcus
