We can add a configurationOfSpec but somebody should find the old and
resurrect it.
I remember that I started to remove bad dependencies
Le 17/3/15 18:04, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
I am assuming requiring SpecTableLayout after it is incorporated into
Spec?
There is currently no configuration for spec since it is inside the
image, so the only way would be to specify version of Pharo (i.e. it's
incorporated in version X, so the user needs at least Pharo X) or
testing whether the class already exists.
As for overriding behavior - loading a package would rewrite existing
code.
There may be some issues if you were to concurrently update both Spec
and your package, and then the latest would win; but there may be
better solution.
Peter
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:24 PM, webwarrior <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Created issue in fogbugz.
Also, if I decide to distribute a library that requires
SpecTableLayout, how
to do it properly? Basically most of changes are new classes (so
may be
shipped in any package), but there is also a modification to
existing method
in SpecInterpreter.
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/SpecTableLayout-not-in-Pahro-4-tp4812428p4812633.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
