2015-03-24 12:37 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba <[email protected]>: > Hi Nicolai, > > I am surprised by your conclusion that the current Brick implementation > disqualifies it from being part of the Core :) >
not the implementation, the uncertainty of its purpose - a GT private implementation / a public framework. > > > All in all, you should see Brick as a pragmatic intermediary step towards > removing Morph. I agree that it can be better (what cannot be), but I > disagree we should discard GT because of it. > I did not say "discard GT" . Brick is in the image, but I don't want to have it in the core image *as another UI-library* next to what we already have - without cleaning that up. You know the questions on the mailing list about what framework to use for creating an application:pure Morphic/Polymorph/Spec/Glamour, and yes I am sure people will come and ask "hey how can I create such cool looking application like spotter". It is already difficult for new people to step in, and get an idea how to work in pharo, or find information about the different frameworks. Nicolai > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" >
