> Am 24.03.2015 um 13:02 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]>: > > NorbertHartl wrote >> What would be better using PharoLauncher? > > I was a hold out, but I've finally started using it and it's really nice. > For things that don't have an automated build process, it's much better than > downloading from file.pharo.org by hand. You can set the folder to which the > images get saved, and choose to make new images from e.g. Pharo 4, 3, 2, > moose, anything on the contribution CI server, and a few others. > > I really like Peter's idea to act from a startup script based on the image > name. That sounds like a powerful combination. >
Oh, I didn't know that you can choose the folder where the images live. I might take another peek at it. But then I'm using something like that for a very long time. - make a folder projects in you home directory - in that folder create symlink to any of your smalltalk project directory that you are working at the moment - drop that folder in the dock - you click the icon on the dock, a list of projects pops up, you select one and you get the contents of that the directory. You click on an image and it starts So I'm not sure I'll gain something but I will try again. Norbert
