> On 06 Apr 2015, at 10:08, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 06 Apr 2015, at 09:58, Andreas Wacknitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Am 06.04.15 09:51, schrieb Esteban Lorenzano:
>>>> On 06 Apr 2015, at 09:41, Andreas Wacknitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Am 06.04.15 09:01, schrieb Esteban Lorenzano:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> there is no real rationale :(
>>>>> the reason why they are there now and not in their corresponding 
>>>>> #defaultInternalPlugins or #defaultExternalPlugins is historic, 
>>>>> configurations growth organically (we would need a refactor there).
>>>> I fear not so many people could do that. I am scratching my head quite 
>>>> often while reading the code.
>>>> BTW: PharoS is being used for Stack vm's so you should either find another 
>>>> abbreviation for Spur or choose the full name (that's what I would prefer).
>>>> Otherwise it will get even harder in the future…
>>> we plan to drop support for plain cog vm and replace it for spur… so Pharo 
>>> and PharoS will be both spur VMs… no need to complicate things here.
>> Ah, OK. So probably I should wait until this happened and everythings 
>> settled down.
>> One more question regarding the future: I guess there will be Spur32 and 
>> Spur64 vm's, right?
>> If so, what are the plans regarding NativeBoost? Will there be a 64 bit 
>> version, too? (Ok, that's more than one question :))
> 
> I’m working on a replacement that takes same syntax but uses regular FFI 
> implementation instead ASM. 
> This will re-orientate our efforts into a common FFI strategy in all 
> platforms and joint with Eliot work. 
> In that direction, there is some important work to speed up (with a new 
> bytecode set and functions to FFI, Ronie and Eliot were working on it), plus 
> a threaded ffi implementation, plus 64bits, plus ARM. 
> So, no need on reinvent the wheel here. 
> NB was important and a very good idea, but sadly we cannot maintain it as-is. 
ah, in case it was not clear: the replacement will be backward-compatible so no 
need to be scared here :)


> 
> Esteban
> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> Andreas
>> 
>>> 
>>>>> at least: FT2Plugin and SqueakSSLPlugin should be in defaults (and in the 
>>>>> future SDL2 too).
>>>>> 
>>>>> for starting your build I suggest you to exclude all the additions 
>>>>> (plugins and external libraries).
>>>>> then add them one by one.
>>>> I already have a running version from almost one year ago. This time I 
>>>> will try to get further (eg. NativeBoost) and want to enhance my 
>>>> documentation.
>>>> But it is time consuming and I would like to spend my time with more 
>>>> interesting things (using Pharo :))
>>> :)
>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Andreas
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Esteban
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 06 Apr 2015, at 08:49, Andreas Wacknitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 03.04.15 17:31, schrieb Esteban Lorenzano:
>>>>>>>>>> I have more questions but I am reluctant to disturb you further as 
>>>>>>>>>> you must be quite busy atm.
>>>>>>>>> ask, I will answer when I can :)
>>>>>> Hi Esteban,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am trying to understand the rationale behind 
>>>>>> PharoVMBuilder>>buildUnix32 (and similar methods like >>buildMacOSX32, 
>>>>>> >>buildFreeBSD32).
>>>>>> How to determine which plugins and libraries to use?
>>>>>>   Linux makes use of
>>>>>>       PharoUnixConfig new
>>>>>>       "generateForDebug;"
>>>>>>       addExternalPlugins: #( FT2Plugin SqueakSSLPlugin SDL2DisplayPlugin 
>>>>>> );
>>>>>>       addThirdpartyLibraries: #(
>>>>>>           'libssh2'
>>>>>>           'libgit2'
>>>>>>           'libsdl2');
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   For FreeBSD it looks like this:
>>>>>>       PharoFreeBSDConfig new
>>>>>>       "generateForDebug;"
>>>>>>       addExternalPlugins: #( SqueakSSLPlugin );
>>>>>>       addInternalPlugins: #( UnixOSProcessPlugin  );
>>>>>>       addThirdpartyLibraries: #(
>>>>>>           'libssh2'
>>>>>>           'libgit2' );
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   Mac OSX:
>>>>>>       PharoOSXConfig new
>>>>>>       "generateForDebug;"
>>>>>>       addExternalPlugins: #( FT2Plugin SDL2DisplayPlugin );
>>>>>>       addInternalPlugins: #( UnixOSProcessPlugin );
>>>>>>       addThirdpartyLibraries: #(
>>>>>>           'cairo'
>>>>>>           'libgit2'
>>>>>>           'libssh2'
>>>>>>           'libsdl2');
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   Windows:
>>>>>>       PharoWindowsConfig new
>>>>>>       addExternalPlugins: #( FT2Plugin SqueakSSLPlugin );
>>>>>>       addInternalPlugins: #( SDL2DisplayPlugin );
>>>>>>       addThirdpartyLibraries: #(
>>>>>>           'cairo'
>>>>>>           'libssh2'
>>>>>>           'libgit2'
>>>>>>           'libsdl2');
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I assume that FreeBSD's configuration is not up-to-date (sdl2 and cairo 
>>>>>> not yet available?).
>>>>>> Should I try to configure cairo, libssh2, libgit2 and libsdl2 libraries 
>>>>>> for openindiana, like it is done for Windows and MacOSX?
>>>>>> Furthermore, should I try to configure SqueakSSLPlugin, FT2Plugin and 
>>>>>> SDL2DisplayPlugin as external plugins and UnixOSProcessPlugin as 
>>>>>> internal plugin?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Andreas

Reply via email to